h1

Abortion and freedom from nature

Monday, 10 August, 2009

I’ve been skulking around various blogs on bioethical issues recently, and I came across this geme from the Christian blog ‘Of Virtue and Life’:

What I am arguing […] is that pregnancy is natural and by saying abortion helps in the liberation of women, it is essentially saying that abortion helps liberate women from nature – which is completely off the wall.

The bottom line for the entire situation is that abortion really doesn’t help in women’s liberation. Having a child doesn’t lower a woman or make her subservient to a man – it is simply a natural process. How is it liberating to go against what is natural? (emphasis mine)

It is that final question that I italicised that I wish to discuss in this post, as in my opinion it can be very, very liberating to go against what is natural. It is exceedingly liberating to be free from nature, and being free from natural limitations on our body and mind. Humans are more liberated now that death does not come so early in life, and we would be most liberated if in the future death existed only as a choice and was never forced upon us by natural causes. Other examples of natural things from which we may want to be liberated include the natural human tendency to put on weight or the natural human limitations on memory or even the fact that humans are not naturally born with wings. But many other natural aspects of everyday life are not entirely pleasant, such as pregnancy and childbirth.

focus_artificial_wombBut first I wish to reinforce the fact that there is nothing inherently good about what is natural. To think so would be the fallacy of ‘appeal to nature’, which is essentially wishful thinking in reverse (wishful thinking is where you think what should be is what will be, and the ‘appeal to nature’ fallacy is where you think what is is also what ought to be). You cannot switch between an is and an ought, as the former is a statement of fact and the latter is a statement of value.

Even from a Christian perspective, I cannot see how one could assume what is natural is also what is good. While it is the Christian belief that the nature of reality was created by a benevolent God, apparently the free will of a couple of humans brought sin which corrupted the world, and therefore not everything we see in nature can be assumed to be good (though God clearly let sin corrupt the world and therefore such corruption was obliviously not against the will of a benevolent God, which brings too many theodical issues for this post).

But getting back to the topic, this means we cannot assume that pregnancy and childbirth are good simply because they are natural.

Furthermore, I think there is good arguments to suggest that many, albeit natural, aspects of pregnancy and childbirth are very bad. Very few women choose a natural childbirth because the options of drug-assistance or surgical deliveries provide much more appealing unnatural childbirths. Many women dislike the effects pregnancy has on their body, both during pregnancy and after childbirth, and are eager to return to their pre-pregnancy figures. And even after childbirth, many things about children are not particularly desirable, such as incessant crying and the cost of raising them. While a strong maternal desire and love of children drives many women to endure these distasteful aspects of pregnancy, I think it stands to reason that the process could be much improved by liberating women from the natural downsides to having children.

In addition to the above-mentioned natural but undesirable aspects of pregnancy,  the most important natural aspect from which we try to liberate ourselves is the choice to go through the whole pregnancy process at all. It’s natural that heterosexual sex between fertile humans can result in pregnancy, but the vast majority of humans (in the first world, at least) take measures to avoid this natural consequence of sex, though most contraceptives are not foolproof. Because of this (and because of the unfortunate – and likely natural – occurrence of rape) pregnancy is not always consensual, a woman can only have complete control over whether she goes through pregnancy and childbirth if she can opt out of the process at any time. So the most liberating scenario for a woman is total and unrestricted access to abortion regardless of her stage of pregnancy.

So I think we can conclude that women are indeed liberated by having the option to abort. And men too can be liberated by abortion, as couples who do not wish to have children are therefore able to ensure they remain childless. That pregnancy and childbirth are natural does nothing to change this, as the freedom to liberate ourselves from nature is freedom nonetheless. Nobody is truly free if they are a slave to nature.

7 comments

  1. Do you actually have an argument in favor of the is/ought problem? I remain unconvinced that “one cannot derive an is from an ought”, which really seems to be a clumsy way of saying that naturalized ethics is impossible.


    • May I assume you mean to say that you are unconvinced that ‘one cannot derive an ought from an is’?

      If so, the general response is that you cannot derive an ought (a normative conclusion) from facts (descriptive premises). And you’re right that the is/ought problem is a major flaw in any type of objective morality based on human nature.


  2. I would also pose the perspective that the natural isn’t in conflict with the technological, but that it’s simply a progression. The boundary is always drawn between technology and nature, and there is a contemporary sentiment that they are at odds with each other, while in truth, the one emerged from the other and is as much a part of it as a rock or a tree.
    Technology is another avenue of progression that has been unlocked to work in tandem with evolution to create greater complexity. It’s also incidentally through technological advances that we will be able to solve the environmental issues created by the scale of new technologies used. Scale is the real issue here, not the underlying advances.

    Good write up, definitely agree with the points made.


  3. pregnancy is unpleasant, as is childbirth and as are operative procedures that prevent the aforementioned.

    I also disagree with how the author uses the argument “Even from a Christian perspective, I cannot see how one could assume what is natural is also what is good”. First, the approach is taken that this is the reason why Christianity opposes those procedures, that the Christian belief is that what is natural is inherently good. That isn’t the case. Evil deeds, as such, are natural in the course of life but aren’t good or perceived as good in the Christian faith. A lot of holes in the argument as presented. Christianity, as it should be presented and isn’t always practiced, is a fight against ill-will and a defense of the defenseless.


    • First, the approach is taken that this is the reason why Christianity opposes those procedures, that the Christian belief is that what is natural is inherently good.

      I argued against such a view because the blog to which I was directing this article presented that view. I know it isn’t necessarily the opinion of all Christians.

      A lot of holes in the argument as presented.

      There are holes, but only because this post wasn’t meant to argue against all Christian objections to abortion. Rather, I intended to argue against the view that abortion goes against the nature of women as breeders, and that such a nature is inherently good.


  4. Hello,
    I am working on a documentary film about human enhancement in which we would like to show the drawing of artificial wombs in line (it appears in the “Abortion and freedom from nature” article and we can sse 4 babies in artificial wombs in line with a computer in front of each).
    Can you please let me know where you find it because I have big difficulties to find theauthor of this image.
    This is an urgent request.
    Thanks,

    claire



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: