Human infra-red thermal vision

Monday, 15 September, 2008

Infra-red (IR) vision refers to sensation AND visual integration of the wavelengths of light between 750 nm and 1mm. In contrast, the human eye can only detect light with wavelengths from 400nm (violet) to 700nm (red). It would be useful to detect infra-red light because although very hot objects emit visible light (hence the terms red hot and white hot) even modestly warm objects emit infrared light. For example, the human body emits light at a wavelength of 10 microns (or 10000nm), and if one could see these wavelengths, one would have the ability to see humans against a colder background (i.e. room temperature). Much like Predator.

Biological IR vision has many problems, the least of which is that n o visual pigment exists that can pick up infra-red light. There are many pigments that can detect ultraviolet (UV) light, with many birds, reptiles, fish and even some mammals (and insects, but their eye is sufficiently different to be irrelevant here) having visual pigments that absorb maximally at around 350-360nm (but can still detect light with a wavelength of 280nm, well into the near UV spectrum). It appears to be relatively easy to evolve UV vision, but IR vision is much harder. As far as I know, the deep-sea dragonfish, a fish that lives deep underwater where almost no light exists, has a porphyropsin that can detect into the near-infrared (these fish also produce their own deep red light, allowing them to see while no other fish can – not unlike a man-made night vision goggles) but even that has can barely detect photons of wavelengths of 750nm. Just barely into infra-red and certainly far short of the 10000nm required for heat-vision.

The animals most famous for their infra-red ‘heat vision’ are the pit vipers (Crotalinae), though Boas and pythons (Boidae) have also independently evolved a more primitive version. They detect thermal radiation with wavelengths from 400nm (i.e. violet) all the way to 10600nm, but they do so not with their eyes, but with loreal pits (in Crotalinae) or labial pits/scales (in Boidae). These are small indentation just around the mouth – which in the Crotalinae are shaped very much like a pinhole camera – and detect heat not infra-red photons. In that sense, they are really just specialised structures that sense heat in the same way we humans can if we hold our hands over an open fire, and so probably utilise a heat-gated ion channel like the vannilloid receptor channel activated in human nerves by heat, pain, rubbing alcohol and chilli peppers. That said, the sensory information from these thermoreceptive pits (or scales) do integrate into the optic tectum, so it is very likely that the snakes are able to see the heat map of their world visually. But is it likely to have low spatial and temporal resolution and would be very short-sighted (a few metres at the most).

So, what is the issue with infrared photoreceptions? Why don’t they exist in nature already? Well, I’ve actually come up with four issues, only one of which may be easily solved (or may not be a problem in the first place).

First, immediately in front of the photoreceptors in the eye of all vertebrates is a few centimetres of water-based vitreous and aqueous fluid. Infra-red radiation is much lower in energy than visual light (remember the energy of a photon is inversely proportional to its wavelength), and water is very good at absorbing infra-red light. Therefore the eye would not actually be transparent for infra-red light, so may absorb a substantial fraction of the photons (van der Berg, 1997) before it hits the retina. It’s might not be so bad, though, because at the low energy of 10000nm, the light may even be too weak to be absorbed by water.

Second, neither of the two photo-active molecules in vertebrates photoreceptors, 11-cis-retinal (A1) or 11-cis-3,4-dehydroretinal (A2), would not stable if it was absorbing at this wavelength. In order to activate these pigments, energy must be supplied from either the light or from the thermal energy (Ala-Laurila et al, 2004). The lower the wavelength of light, the less energy the photons have, so the greater the thermal energy must contribute to the activation energy. The thermal energy, however, can activate the photoreceptor by itself – one of the reasons why cold-blooded creatures are theoretically more sensitive to single photons (because a single photon even is indistinguishable from random thermal activation, and cold creatures will have less thermal activity) (Aho et al, 1988). If we were trying to set up a molecule that would activate from an infra-red photon, even one with a much shorter wavelength than 10 microns, we’d have a molecule that would activate very easily due to thermal noise. In other words, we’d have a lot of ‘static’ in a thermal visual system – so much so, that I doubt we’d be able to even see anything.

The third problem is the neural circuitry that would be required to process another colour. The retina has colour opponent ganglion cells, which feed into the colour-sensitive parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus, which in turn stimulate sets of neurons called blob cells in the the visual cortex (Dacey, D.M., 1996). These systems are responsible for processing colour differences (for example, the difference between green and blue). There is a rare syndrome known as cerebral achromatopsia, where a person has a loss of colour vision (see the world in shades of gray) despite fully function cone photoreception, because of lesions to the parts of the brain responsible for this colour discrimination (Barbur et al, 1994). That said, it may be an undamaged brain will be able to adapt to accommodate any changes to colour-related inputs, even during adulthood (Neitz et al, 2002).

The last problem and perhaps the greatest problem with allowing humans to visualise thermal emissions, is that the eye itself it an emission source. The eye is covered in warm blood vessels, each emitting at the same wavelength as the other humans who we would like to detect with our thermal vision. Thermal signals from behind the photoreceptors could perhaps be shielded, allowing the photoreceptor cells to only detect signals from directly in front of it, but even the aqueous and vitreous humours and corneal cells are emitting thermal signals. The internal signal would still likely be greater than that reaching the photoreceptors from external emissions sources (like another person) . Pythons and pit vipers are cold-blooded, so they don’t have this problem. But to a warm-blooded human, it would be like trying to look out into the night from inside a brightly-lit room.

Therefore, I can only see two options for thermal vision in humans. One, we could have separate eyes mounted on a cold antennae, or use thermal-vision goggles. Considering that the latter option is already used, I say that method is the easiest to follow – one day, we may even integrate the output from such goggles into our visual cortex. Until then, despite its popularity as a possible enhancement, biological ly integrated infra-red thermal vision in humans will have to wait.



  1. All radiation has a frequency… Yes?

    So what if the integrated equipment would nullify any radiation being received that would match the radiation being put out by the user?

    Yes, this would create gaps in the field of vision, as you would not be able to see anything that matched the temperature of your eyes… But even so.. Maybe you could merely drop your temperature so that your temperature would be lower than that of which you are trying to see?


  2. Yes, this would create gaps in the field of vision, as you would not be able to see anything that matched the temperature of your eyes.

    The temperature of your eyes is basically the same as the human body temperature, and the body temperature of most mammals and birds.

    I’m not sure what the point of thermal vision would be if you couldn’t use it to see other people or animals.

    Maybe you could merely drop your temperature so that your temperature would be lower than that of which you are trying to see?

    That would take a lot of effort. All the chemical reactions in your body, and the enzymes, are optimised for the body temperature. That’s why just a slight change causes heatstroke or hypothermia. You’d essentially have to change every enzyme in the body – a lot of effort, I assure you.

    I suggested eyes mounted on cold stalks protruding from one’s head – that is more feasible, I think.

  3. I’ve always wondered if the ability to see auras that some humans claim to possess could be a rare ability to detect infrared light. After all there are other rare differences in human sense organs, the one most familiar to me being the presence of an equivalent to the macula neglecta (found in fishes and used for hearing)in the inner ear of some humans.

  4. Just thought you might want to know that this article prompted this to be my final project in my undergraduate Biophysics class. very interesting stuff, keep it coming. Also have you ever heard of any discussion of using a tapetum lucidum to accommodate night vision in humans? It seems more logical to use natures answer to giving night vision to mammals, instead of trying to force Viper or Deep Sea Dragonfish adaptations on a warm blooded animal.


  5. I recently met a guy who claimed to be able to see the light from appx. 1 out of 3 remote controllers for TVs and DVD players. I’m guessing these send out light very close to the visible spectrum (only slightly larger than 750 nm wavelength.) I wonder, could a small deviation in maximum wavelength somehow be possible, perhaps due to some sort of visual mutation or genetic issue?

  6. It is possible to employ Liquid crystal shows to
    get creating, which usually camcorders contain a not for relocating
    semi-transparent reflection. There are also the bifocal contact lenses used to correct
    presbyopia. They produce each vision and esthetical speak to lenses.

  7. I simply started reading and I’m glad I did.
    You’re an excellent blogger, among the very best that
    I’ve seen. This weblog undoubtedly has some facts on topic which I just wasn’t aware of.

    Thank you for bringing this stuff to light.

  8. Pretty! This has been an incredibly wonderful article.
    Many thanks for supplying this info.

  9. Actually, people can see infrared, at least up to 1064 nm, and likely up to 1152 nm. In the mid-20th century vision researchers documented human ability to see well into the 900s. The definitive study on the subject was done by Sliney et al (1976) using heavily filtered infrared lasers, all with 3 mm beams. At 1064 nm the average power needed to see the light was 0.069 mW (entire beam, measured at the pupil). Above 632,8 nm the cones are more sensitive than the rods so that color is at maximum saturation at threshold.

    As for what it looks like, basically red, but trending towards orange at higher wavelengths. Above 704 nm the sensitivity of the green cones tapers off more slowly that that of the red cones, while the blue cones play no significant role. This is known as infrared color reversal.

    With the last laser they tested was at 1152 nm, none of the test subjects saw the light. Researchers calculated that it should have been visible at 3 – 4 mW, but thought it would unsafe to go any higher than 2.5 mW, mainly for thermal reasons. They didn’t want to go above a rise of 1.0 degree C in the hottest part of the retina over the course of 10-second exposure during which time power would be increased by a factor of ten in ten steps.

    In the mid range of the near infrared, sensitivity drops off by about one order of magnitude every 50 nm, with minor variations in the opacity of the eye in the high 900s and low 1000s, and a major increase starting around 1200 nm to 1300nm. To see 1200 nm you would need to shine a 40-mW laser in your eye (not safe). At 1250nm it would have to be about 400 mW (guaranteed eye injury).

    • I need more posts like this on my blog. Thank you!

  10. I like this website very much. Superb info.

  11. I once saw an infrared image flying out of an engineer’s monitors. He had 2 monitors side by side, customary in oil and gas companies — and while talking to the other engineer (on the right hand side) I saw waves flash out of the other guy’s computer (on the left) from (saw them thru my left eye). I was shocked as i quickly turned to him and said, wo, what just came out of your computer! It turned into a pear shape blob (blue with red outline on the outer body). It was bouncing up and down on the corner of a white wall and nobody could see it but me. I started to feel scared, anxious and awkward for fear that people thought i had already had a bad morning. The other engineer quickly pulled out a thermal imaging camera that he had just used in the pipeline fields and charged it and was shocked. The same image appeared on the lens and both engineers were astonished and they followed the image with the camera while I saw it with the naked eye. They were so shocked that they didn’t even think about taking a snapshot. I had never experienced something like this in my life and DO NOT want to experience that again. That day I asked how the camera worked and he took a snapshot of me as well…while viewing my pic, i could see all the colors of the rainbow, but later, I was told that it turned out to be a negative where you could see my face completely in the dark.

    Would there be something abnormal with my eye? I do have great peripheral vision and tested on this machine at the eye dr, where you sort of look at space and press a button every time you see a (star twinkle). I don’t think I missed any.

    I will never know what happened that day — all i know is that I was just sharing with them that their mail delivery person had just passed.

  12. I have seen a thermal image in total darkness before with my own eyes after just waking up. I know it was real because I hunt with thermal and know what to look for. Believe it not, no matter to me, but HOW could this be possible.? There has to be something going on in human eyes that make it capable of seeing thermal at some point some time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: